|
|
|
|
||
|
Regional Japan-U.S. Forces Protecting Common Interests in KEEN EDGE / YAMA SAKURA 2007 Indian Navy Enhances Amphibious Capability Building Trust and Security Strengthening the ROK-U.S. Alliance in RSOI/FOAL EAGLE 2007 War On AMAN 2007: Nations United Against Maritime Terrorism Humanitarian Partnership for Health in Vietnam Partnership for Peace and Security in BALIKATAN 2007 Focus U.S. Commitment to Asia-Pacific Security: F-22A Fighter Happenings :: |
1 :: 2 ::
3
Winning
in the Pacific: The Special Operations Forces Indirect Approach Reprinted with permission of the Joint Forces Quarterly (JFQ), this text is in JFQ 1st Quarter 2007 issue. Maj. Gen. David P. Fridovich, USA, is Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, Pacific. Lt. Col. Fred T. Krawchuk, USA, is a Staff Officer, U.S. Special Operations Command, Pacific. Combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan dominate the headlines, but Southeast Asia has emerged as a quiet yet increasingly crucial front in the Long War. Given the suicide bombings in Bali, the presence of the terrorist groups Jemaah Islamiyah and Abu Sayyaf, and increased anti-Americanism,1 the need for a continued and comprehensive approach to combating terror in the Pacific is clear. The U.S. Special Operations Command, Pacific (SOCPAC) has been improving ties with regional allies and increasingly applying an indirect approach to address the threat posed by militant groups with connections to al Qaeda. The Indirect Approach To address the underlying conditions that foster terrorism, SOCPAC works with host nation partners to help provide security and stability. This method promotes economic development and shapes conditions for good governance and rule of law. Much of the command’s effort consists of foreign internal defense and unconventional warfare.3 The primary contribution of Special Operations Forces (SOF) in this interagency activity is to organize, train, and assist local security forces. The indirect approach relies heavily on the SOF capability to build host nation defense capacity, provide civil affairs forces to give humanitarian and civic assistance, and offer information operations assets to aid the partner. The indirect approach demands diplomacy and respect for political sensitivities. SOCPAC focuses on working in close coordination with host nation military and political leadership, law enforcement, and U.S. country teams in the region (to include the U.S. Agency for International Development and Department of State Public Diplomacy officials). These stakeholders share the responsibility of capacity-building and leverage each other’s strengths and synchronize efforts. To produce institutional change, host nation partners have to be willing to reform as required. Interagency and multinational will and capacity-building must go hand in hand for the indirect approach to succeed. Success is measured in terms of accomplishments through, by, and with host nation partners. Over time, these partners are building a long-lasting, self-sustaining capability to provide security, develop good governance, attract foreign direct investment, and counter violent ideology. This process is slow, but it achieves lasting results. Part of our commitment is to remain patient and focus on a long-term indirect method that results in self-sustaining host nation partners. Relationships Through experience, we know we can succeed only through bilateral or multilateral cooperation. Unilateral actions are neither necessary nor welcome. Partner nations willingly accept the lead in their own countries. Additionally, many nations prefer that the United States maintain a low-visibility presence on their soil. SOF can do this with little external support and low overhead from higher headquarters, which supports the Department of Defense concept of small footprints in the region. This method respects local populaces, increases legitimacy, and improves the American image among host populations. By working with host nation partners and the country team, SOCPAC creates trust and credibility. Serving in the “advise and assist” role, participants have to be open with each other about the training needs of the security forces, as well as which capabilities they bring that can help build capacity. Developing competent forces on both sides requires candid assessments and dedication as well as clear communication. Participants must not ignore feedback or overreact to training setbacks. Instead, they must continue to assess and adapt training programs, and be aware of which capacities are improving. Such a focused training cycle produces quantifiable and observable results. Typically, the host nation force performs a capabilities demonstration during a closing ceremony. Host nation government and senior military officials, as well as the U.S. Ambassador, often attend. The demonstration is visible proof of what the host military gained from U.S. participation. Tangible improvements and demonstrated abilities enhance American credibility with host nation officials and the Ambassador alike.
E-mail: apdforum@apan-info.net
|
|